Source: ../../policy/backend/version_filters.hh
|
|
|
|
// -*- c-basic-offset: 4; tab-width: 8; indent-tabs-mode: t -*-
// vim:set sts=4 ts=8:
// Copyright (c) 2001-2005 International Computer Science Institute
//
// Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
// copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software")
// to deal in the Software without restriction, subject to the conditions
// listed in the XORP LICENSE file. These conditions include: you must
// preserve this copyright notice, and you cannot mention the copyright
// holders in advertising related to the Software without their permission.
// The Software is provided WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. This
// notice is a summary of the XORP LICENSE file; the license in that file is
// legally binding.
// $XORP: xorp/policy/backend/version_filters.hh,v 1.2 2005/10/02 22:21:53 abittau Exp $
#ifndef __POLICY_BACKEND_VERSION_FILTERS_HH__
#define __POLICY_BACKEND_VERSION_FILTERS_HH__
#include "policy_filters.hh"
/**
* @short Policy filters which support versioning [i.e. keep old version].
*
* The idea is to create a new policy filter on each configuration. Whenever a
* route is being processed, you read which filter to run. If this filter is 0,
* [null pointer] then give it the last configuration. Else just run whatever
* filter is returned.
*
* Filters should be referenced counted by routes. When reference count reaches
* 0, it should be deleted.
*
* Why not keep filters internally here and read a filter id from route? Well
* because we cannot assume when to increment and decrement the reference count.
* Say it's a normal route lookup and we do the filtering, and it results to
* "accepted". It doesn't imply we need to +1 the reference count.
*/
class VersionFilters : public PolicyFilters {
public:
VersionFilters();
};
#endif // __POLICY_BACKEND_VERSION_FILTERS_HH__
Generated by: pavlin on possum.icir.org on Thu Mar 9 04:43:25 2006, using kdoc $.